Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1175/2024

Case between Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society et al vs Ajithkumar G et al regarding interim injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. .Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-04-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including the Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society, are seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with their roles as elected office bearers. The defendants deny that the plaintiffs hold any authority within the society and claim the suit has been fraudulently filed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case and therefore dismissed the petition for injunctive relief.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case and therefore dismissed the petition for injunctive relief.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to validate their claims of being the duly elected members.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to validate their claims of being the duly elected members.
Supporting Evidence
the petitioners have failed to prove prima facie that they are the duly elected managing committee members of 1st petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Considering the finding on point Nos.1 to 4, the petition is liable to be dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R Rajeev
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K B Manilal
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C A Rajesh
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajithkumar G
Party Age
50
Relation
father's name not known to the plaintiffs
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K H Mary Das
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad John
Party Age
54
Relation
father's name not known to the plaintiffs
Plaintiffs Documents
Various documents including meeting minutes and letters asserting the plaintiffs' claims.
Defendants Documents
Documents validating defendants' election and management of the first petitioner Society.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Susanth Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sidharth O
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Albin A Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nekha Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John Mathew Therezhath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioners sought a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their authority in the society.
Evidence:
Hence points are found against the petitioners 2 to 4.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Byelaw
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the structure and rules governing the 1st plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Minutes of Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the results of the election where plaintiffs No. 2 to 4 were allegedly elected as office bearers.
Reference:
Ext.A37
Document Type: Minutes of Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is claimed by plaintiffs to indicate a meeting of the 1st plaintiff society, but the court found it misrepresented as it belongs to KEWSA.
Reference:
Ext.A38
Document Type: Bye-law
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document clarifies the legal framework under which the 1st plaintiff society operates.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Online Registration Details
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document provides updated registration details of the 1st petitioner society, showing the current office bearers.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: List of Governing Councils
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document confirms the list of governing councils for the 1st petitioner society from the Registrar.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society et al vs Ajithkumar G et al regarding interim injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society et al vs Ajithkumar G et al regarding interim injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Charitable Society

Similar Cases

Case between Federation of Residents Associations, Thiruvananthapuram vs P.Satheesh Kumar, K Sugunan, Manoharan Nair regarding declaration and injunction.
Court of Additional Munsiff - I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Eljove.C. Chummar vs M/S Kunnamkulam Charitable Society et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V.C.Babu vs Mithram et al regarding ad-interim injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sree Khandakarna – Bhadrakaali Kshethra Kshema Karma Samithi et al vs Mukundan et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Catholic Truth Charitable Society et al vs Major Arch Diocese of Ernakulam Angamaly et al regarding dismissal for default.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won