Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 274/2023

Case between Eljove.C. Chummar vs M/S Kunnamkulam Charitable Society et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi .K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-06-11
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 days
Case Closed
Tue, 06/11/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Eljove.C. Chummar, the plaintiff, and M/S Kunnamkulam Charitable Society along with its executive committee members, as defendants. The plaintiff seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the newly elected executive committee's actions, claiming that several committee members are disqualified as per the society's bye-laws.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, finding no merit in the plaintiff's claims regarding the election procedures of the managing committee. The defendants were found to satisfy the eligibility criteria as per the bye-laws.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, finding no merit in the plaintiff's claims regarding the election procedures of the managing committee. The defendants were found to satisfy the eligibility criteria as per the bye-laws.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the election procedures were in accordance with the bye-laws of the society.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the election procedures were in accordance with the bye-laws of the society.
Supporting Evidence
From the above discussion this court is satisfied that the plaintiff has failed to establish that the defendants are disqualified by virtue of ineligibility from being a member as per clause 4(1)(a) of the Ext.A1 bye-law of the 1st defendant society.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Eljove.C. Chummar
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/S Kunnamkulam Charitable Society
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prakash.A.M
Party Age
55
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geever.K.I
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Davis.A.I
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varghese.C.P
Party Age
60
Plaintiffs Documents
Original of the Byelaw of the 1st defendant association, Copy of the complaint submitted to the returning officer regarding disqualification of 3rd defendant.
Defendants Documents
Receipt issued from Kochi Municipal Corporation to the 2nd defendant.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.T Anil Kumar(Anil Mamala)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Josepaul Thottam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Benraj.K.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima Razak
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aiswarya
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajeev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mahesh.V.Ramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Pramod.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Praveen.K.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from acting as the managing committee of the 1st defendant association.
Evidence:
Hence point No.3 and 4 are also found against the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a decree for declaration regarding the validity of the election procedures.
Evidence:
Hence point No.3 and 4 are also found against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Bye-law
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The bye-law of the 1st defendant society was central to the claims regarding eligibility and qualifications of its members.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The complaint submitted to the returning officer regarding the disqualification of the 3rd defendant highlighted issues of membership eligibility.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: RTI Reply
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply from Cochin Corporation showing the disqualification of the 3rd defendant was used to support the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The complaint regarding the disqualification of the 5th defendant was relevant to the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: RTI Reply
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply from Cochin Corporation showing the disqualification of the 5th defendant was presented as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The complaint concerning the disqualification of the 7th defendant formed part of the allegations.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: RTI Reply
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply from Cochin Corporation showing the disqualification of the 7th defendant was used to support the plaintiff's position.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The complaint regarding the disqualification of the 9th defendant was part of the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The complaint regarding the disqualification of the 16th defendant contributed to the plaintiff's arguments.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: RTI Reply
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply regarding the 16th defendant's business establishment was relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The detailed complaint outlining the disqualifications of several defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued by the Secretary, Kochi Municipal Corporation to the 2nd defendant supporting their claims.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued from Kochi, Municipal Corporation to Smt. Mini Geever.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Consent letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Consent letter issued by Smt. Mini Geever to the 3rd defendant to represent their business.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued by the Secretary, Kochi Municipal Corporation to the 4th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued by the Secretary, Kochi Municipal Corporation to Sri. Abel Varghese.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Consent letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Consent letter issued by Sri. Abel Varghese to the 5th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Visiting Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Visiting card of M/S Star Lights owned by the 5th defendant and his son.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: GST Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
GST Registration certificate issued by the Government of India in favour of the 6th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued by the Secretary, Kochi, Municipal Corporation to Smt. C.C Latha.
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Certified Copy of Lease Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Registered Lease deed related to 7th defendant's business.
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type: GST Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
GST Registration Certificate issued by the Government of India in favour of the 9th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B12
Document Type: Income Tax Return Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Income Tax Return Acknowledgment issued by the Income Tax Department to the 10th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B13
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued from Kochi Municipal Corporation to the 11th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B14
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued from Kochi Municipal Corporation to the 9th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B15
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued from Kochi Municipal Corporation to the 13th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B16
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued from Kochi Municipal Corporation to the 14th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B17
Document Type: GST Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
GST Registration Certificate issued by the Government of India in favour of the 15th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B18
Document Type: Rent Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Rent receipt issued from Kochi Municipal corporation to the 16th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B19
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt issued from Kochi Municipal Corporation to the 16th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B20

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Violation of bye-laws
Case Code
Case between Eljove.C. Chummar vs M/S Kunnamkulam Charitable Society et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Eljove.C. Chummar vs M/S Kunnamkulam Charitable Society et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 05/24/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/11/2024 - 12:00
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Charitable Society

Similar Cases

Case between Federation of Residents Associations, Thiruvananthapuram vs P.Satheesh Kumar, K Sugunan, Manoharan Nair regarding declaration and injunction.
Court of Additional Munsiff - I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between V.C.Babu vs Mithram et al regarding ad-interim injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sree Khandakarna – Bhadrakaali Kshethra Kshema Karma Samithi et al vs Mukundan et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Catholic Truth Charitable Society et al vs Major Arch Diocese of Ernakulam Angamaly et al regarding dismissal for default.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society et al vs Ajithkumar G et al regarding interim injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won