Case Summary
K.C.Marakkar filed a suit against Alavikutty for money. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.
The plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.
The plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff's name called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.C.Marakkar
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alavikutty
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Najmudheen.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Jamshid Rahman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.C.Marakkar vs Alavikutty regarding money.
Case Code Year
Case between K.C.Marakkar vs Alavikutty regarding money.