Original Suit No. 226 OF 2016

Case between K.Balachandran vs K.Velayudhan et al regarding partition of property

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2018-03-03

Duration

Approximately 1 year

Case Closed

Sat, 03/03/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff filed a partition suit claiming his share of the property jointly owned with the defendants after repeated demands for separate allotment.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Partition of property into 5 equal shares among the parties

Case Type

Civil Suit - Partition

Final Judgment

The court decreed the partition of the property into 5 equal shares among the parties involved.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff proved his case by cogent and reliable evidence.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff proved his case by cogent and reliable evidence.

Supporting Evidence

As already stated above the suit is filed for partition and separate allotment of plaintiff share with a claim for equity. Plaintiff proved his case by cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 5 equal shares by metes and bounds.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K.Balachandran
Party Age: 71
Relation: S/o Unnaman

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: K.Velayudhan
Party Age: 76
Relation: S/o Unnaman

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: K.Damayanthi
Party Age: 68
Relation: W/o Thachilath Balan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Lakshmi.K.
Party Age: 58
Relation: W/o Vasu

Plaintiffs Documents

True copy of Partition deed No.822/1993 dt; 8-3-1993

Defendants Documents

Not available

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Partition of property into 5 equal shares among the parties

Evidence:

The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 5 equal shares by metes and bounds.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition deed copy

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Proved the history of property ownership and partition

Reference:

Case Classification