Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 238 OF 20 17

Case between Kattakath Pathumma vs Saidalavi et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-01-20
Duration
Less than 1 year
Case Closed
Sat, 01/20/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff filed a suit seeking injunction against the defendants regarding a property dispute, which was subsequently settled in Lok Adalath resulting in the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed by the court after the matter was settled in Adalath.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed by the court after the matter was settled in Adalath.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. Settled in Adalath. Since matter is settled the counsel for plaintiff submitted that suit can be dismissed. Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kattakath Pathumma
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o. Marakkar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saidalavi
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o. Kuttyamu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Electrical Sub Division, Kottakkal
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary, The Kerala State Electricity Board, Thiruvananthapuram
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E.M. Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Mohamed Rafi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. A. Padmakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction against the defendants
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Settled in Adalath. Since matter is settled the counsel for plaintiff submitted that suit can be dismissed. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Injunction Suit
Case Code
Case between Kattakath Pathumma vs Saidalavi et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kattakath Pathumma vs Saidalavi et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 01/20/2018 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Thalhath.K et al vs Programme Committee et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Saidalavi vs Assistant Executive Engineer et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between R. Thulasi et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Amal Dev.V.V et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Abhin.P vs General Convener et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won