Case Summary
Minor plaintiff represented by guardian father filed a suit seeking injunction, but the suit was dismissed due to absence of plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit advanced suo-moto. Counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from client. Plaintiff's name called absent. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Amal Dev.V.V
- Party Age
- 14
- Relation
- Represented by guardian father Vinodan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala
- Relation
- Represented by District Collector, Malappuram
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Principal, DIET,B.P. Angadi, Tirur
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction
Evidence:
Suit advanced suo-moto. Counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from client. Plaintiff's name called absent. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Amal Dev.V.V et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Amal Dev.V.V et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction