Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.175/2024

Case between Karthyani vs Santha et al regarding partition.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration
Case Code No.
175
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lawsuit for partition among legal heirs of late Chathan Ayyappan, including descendants and widow.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Suit decreed for partition with plaintiff receiving 1/4th share in property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partitional injunction
Case Type
Partition
Final Judgment
No
Suit decreed for partition with plaintiff receiving 1/4th share in property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Absence of counter evidence supporting plaintiff's claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Absence of counter evidence supporting plaintiff's claims.
Supporting Evidence
Unchallenged evidence from plaintiff and supporting documents validated plaintiff's claims.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: 1. The plaint schedule property is ordered to be partitioned by metes and bounds in to 4 equal shares. 2. The plaintiff is entitled to 1/4th share in the plaint schedule property. 3. Plaintiff is entitled to be put in separate possession of her share in the plaint schedule property. 4. Costs of the suit shall bear out of the estate. 5. Convert to final decree application.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Karthyani
Party Age
80
Relation
D/o Chathan Ayyappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o Late Thankappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreejan
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o Late Thankappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeba
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o Late Thankappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vilasini
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o Late Velayudhan(S/o Chathan Ayyappan)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreeja
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o Late Velayudhan(S/o Chathan Ayyappan)
Plaintiffs Documents
Purchase certificate 28.08.1976, Death certificate of Thankappan 08.03.2013, Death certificate of Vayyankili 12.07.2019, Death certificate of Kalyani Gopalan 14.12.2023, Tax receipt 27.06.2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. G. Dileepkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. R. Deepa
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to relief of perpetual injunction
Evidence:
In the absence of any contra evidence, unchallenged evidence of plaintiff and documents marked as Ext.A1 to A5 prove the case
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree for partition passed
Evidence:
Preliminary decree passed for partitioning plaint schedule property into 4 equal shares

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of ownership of plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of death of Thankappan
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of death of Vayyankili
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of death of Kalyani Gopalan
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of tax payment
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Partition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

House Wife

Similar Cases

Case between Shaharban V.A et al vs Hashim V.A et al regarding partition
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Partition Unknown
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Arrikar Foods Pvt. Ltd., et al vs M/s Swapna Traders, regarding recovery of dues for purchase of rice products
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Civil Plaintiff Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won