Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 597/2025

Case between The Karnataka Bank Ltd. vs Vipin Nath et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-12-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Karnataka Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Vipin Nath and Savithri. The case was dismissed as not pressed due to the absence of the defendants and no representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by The Karnataka Bank Ltd. was dismissed as not pressed. The court determined that the plaintiff was not entitled to a refund of the court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by The Karnataka Bank Ltd. was dismissed as not pressed. The court determined that the plaintiff was not entitled to a refund of the court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Karnataka Bank Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vipin Nath
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Savithri
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A Dinesh Rao
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K Manuraj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Moly EV
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Counsel for plaintiff sought refund of court fee paid.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff sought refund of 1/10th court fee paid and cited decision in 2021(2) KHC 62.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Karnataka Bank Ltd. vs Vipin Nath et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Case Code Year
Case between The Karnataka Bank Ltd. vs Vipin Nath et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won