Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 782/2022

Case between Kannan V vs ICICI Bank Ltd et al regarding a suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kannan V, filed a suit against ICICI Bank Ltd and its manager. The case involved a hearing where the plaintiff was absent, leading to a decision on the application and rejection of the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the IA and rejected the plaint under order 7 Rule(d) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

IA 04/22 allowed (VSO). Plaint is rejected under order 7 Rule(d) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kannan V (35 years years) Sarovaram, Mulluvila, Neyyattinkara Olathanni, Thiruvananthapuram-695133

Defendants

ICICI Bank Ltd (Age not specified years) ICICI Bank Towers, Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai 400051 Manager, ICICI Bank Limited (Age not specified years) 1st Floor, Rapg. M.G Road, Pulimoodu Trivandrum- 695001

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaint is rejected under order 7 Rule(d) of Civil Procedure Code.
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected under order 7 Rule(d) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases