Case Summary
The plaintiff, Kannan V, filed a suit against ICICI Bank Ltd and its manager. The case involved a hearing where the plaintiff was absent, leading to a decision on the application and rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the IA and rejected the plaint under order 7 Rule(d) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
IA 04/22 allowed (VSO). Plaint is rejected under order 7 Rule(d) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kannan V
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- ICICI Bank Ltd
- Relation
- Represented By
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager, ICICI Bank Limited
- Relation
- Represented By
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.A. Abhilash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Lal K. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P. Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adithya S. Puthezath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sanjay Sellen
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smita Rose Benjamin
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaint is rejected under order 7 Rule(d) of Civil Procedure Code.
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected under order 7 Rule(d) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kannan V vs ICICI Bank Ltd et al regarding a suit
Case Code Year
Case between Kannan V vs ICICI Bank Ltd et al regarding a suit