Case Summary
Kallingal Kuttu filed a suit for injunction against Ramlath. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and had no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and there was no representation.
Plaintiff was absent and there was no representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's counsel submitted that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff called. Absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kallingal Kuttu
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramlath
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.A. Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Dinesh Pookayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought an injunction.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kallingal Kuttu vs Ramlath regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Kallingal Kuttu vs Ramlath regarding injunction.