Original Suit No. 344 OF 2013

Case between Kallingal Janaki vs Kallingal Gopalan, Kallingal Chinnan, Kallingal Balan, Karthiayani regarding partition and separate allotment.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN

Order Date

2019-09-04

Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kallingal Janaki filed a petition for partition and separate allotment against Kallingal Gopalan, Kallingal Chinnan, Kallingal Balan, and Karthiayani. The court dismissed the interlocutory application, indicating that no partition or separate allotment was possible.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the application for partition and separate allotment due to the dismissal of a previous interlocutory application.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
IA 935/19 was dismissed, making partition and separate allotment impossible.

Judgment Evidence:

Since IA 935/19 dismissed, no partition and separate allotment is possible. Hence IA dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kallingal Janaki (41 Years years) Kuttippuram amsom, Perassannur desom, PO. Perassanur, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Kallingal Gopalan (55 years years) Kallingal Chinnan (52 Years years) Kuttippuram amsom, Perassanur desom, PO. Perassanur, Tirur Taluk, PIN 679 588 Kallingal Balan (60 Years years) Karthiayani (49 Years years) Chengayithodiyil House, (Cherukudangad amsom, Pazhayangadi desom, PO. Pazhayangadi, Pallippuram, PIN 679 305, Ottappalam Taluk)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Request for partition and separate allotment in the interlocutory application.

Evidence:

Since IA 935/19 dismissed, no partition and separate allotment is possible.