Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 344 OF 2013

Case between Kallingal Janaki vs Kallingal Gopalan, Kallingal Chinnan, Kallingal Balan, Karthiayani regarding partition and separate allotment.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kallingal Janaki filed a petition for partition and separate allotment against Kallingal Gopalan, Kallingal Chinnan, Kallingal Balan, and Karthiayani. The court dismissed the interlocutory application, indicating that no partition or separate allotment was possible.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application for partition and separate allotment due to the dismissal of a previous interlocutory application.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application for partition and separate allotment due to the dismissal of a previous interlocutory application.
Key Reasoning:
IA 935/19 was dismissed, making partition and separate allotment impossible.
Why Defendant Won:
IA 935/19 was dismissed, making partition and separate allotment impossible.
Supporting Evidence
Since IA 935/19 dismissed, no partition and separate allotment is possible.

Judgment Evidence:

Since IA 935/19 dismissed, no partition and separate allotment is possible. Hence IA dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kallingal Janaki
Party Age
41
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kallingal Gopalan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kallingal Chinnan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kallingal Balan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karthiayani
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.M.V.Bindu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Request for partition and separate allotment in the interlocutory application.
Evidence:
Since IA 935/19 dismissed, no partition and separate allotment is possible.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kallingal Janaki vs Kallingal Gopalan, Kallingal Chinnan, Kallingal Balan, Karthiayani regarding partition and separate allotment.
Case Code Year
Case between Kallingal Janaki vs Kallingal Gopalan, Kallingal Chinnan, Kallingal Balan, Karthiayani regarding partition and separate allotment.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won