Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.103/2021

Case between Kali et al vs Ayyappankutty et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-26
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 07/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Kali, Prameswaran, Bhavani, Sarojini, and Sivadasan, filed a suit against the defendants, Ayyappankutty, Sheena, Sreeja, Rajan, Sujatha, Shanon, and Saranya. The case ended with the suit being dismissed for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs during the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs during the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were absent from the court without representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were absent from the court without representation.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent continuously, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kali
Party Age
90
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prameswaran
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bhavani
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarojini
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivadasan
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayyappankutty
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheena
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreeja
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujatha
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Maitheen M Pareeth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent continuously, suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kali et al vs Ayyappankutty et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Kali et al vs Ayyappankutty et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 07/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won