Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 329 OF 2017

Case between Kadeeja vs Areekkadan Kasim regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Kadeeja, Shameera, and Sajitha, are seeking an injunction against the defendants, Areekkadan Kasim, Areekkadan Kunheerya, and others, regarding a road they claim as a public access route. The defendants contended that the road is part of their property and attempted to obstruct access.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them an injunction against the defendants to prevent interference with the public road.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their case with cogent and reliable evidence, supported by their claims of longstanding public use of the road.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- I. The defendants and their men are restrained, by way of Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, from interfering with the vehicular access through the B schedule road by the plaintiff and also alter its lie and nature.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kadeeja (58 years) Ambazhapulli House Shameera (35 years) Naduvil Thotti House Sajitha (39 years) Peringadan House

Defendants

Areekkadan Kasim (50 years) Kurumbathoor amsom Punnathala desom & Post Areekkadan Kunheerya (55 years) Kurumbathoor amsom & Post, Koodasseri desom Aboobacker (58 years) Kurumbathoor amsom & Post, Koodasseri desom Areekkadan Kunhami (57 years) Athavanadu amsom desom, P.O.Karipol, Near Karipol Petrol Pump

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants restrained from interfering with vehicular access through the B schedule road.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are restrained, by way of Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, from interfering with the vehicular access through the B schedule road by the plaintiff and also alter its lie and nature.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes ownership of property by plaintiff No. 1.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes ownership of property by the husband of plaintiff No. 2.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes ownership of property by plaintiff No. 3.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of ownership and use of the properties.
Reference:
Ext.A4 to A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details findings related to the encroachment issue.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provides a visual representation of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases