R.C.P. No. 175/2018

Case between K. Rajkumar vs K.S. Muraleekrishna et al regarding petition under Section 11 of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965.

Court

THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.

Order Date

2024-10-05

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K. Rajkumar filed a petition against K.S. Muraleekrishna and Venugopal L. Pillai under the Kerala Buildings Lease & Rent Control Act. The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner did not show interest in prosecuting the case further.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court found that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the case and therefore dismissed it for default.

Key Reasoning:
Petitioner showed no interest in the case.

Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner showed no interest in the case.

Supporting Evidence

Petitioner no representation. Respondent represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K. Rajkumar
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: K.S. Muraleekrishna
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Venugopal L. Pillai
Party Age: 50

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K.C. Charles
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Renju A.T.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Vimal K. Charles
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The petition was dismissed for default due to no representation from the petitioner.

Evidence: