Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.403/2019

Case between K K Muhammad @ Kunjumuhammad vs S N Rock Products et al regarding balance court fee not remitted.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K K Muhammad @ Kunjumuhammad filed a suit against S N Rock Products and its representatives regarding the remittance of court fee. The court ruled that the suit was rejected due to the balance court fee not being paid.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the balance court fee was not remitted and thus rejected the petition. The judgment was pronounced in open court on the same day.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the balance court fee was not remitted and thus rejected the petition. The judgment was pronounced in open court on the same day.
Key Reasoning:
The court rejected the case due to the plaintiffs' failure to remit the required court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The court rejected the case due to the plaintiffs' failure to remit the required court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The court dismissed the case based on the non-remittance of the balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not remitted. Plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K K Muhammad @ Kunjumuhammad
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S N Rock Products
Party Age
55
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S N Rock Products
Party Age
43
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G Govindan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K O Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K M Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sarath S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Balance Court Fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K K Muhammad @ Kunjumuhammad vs S N Rock Products et al regarding balance court fee not remitted.
Case Code Year
Case between K K Muhammad @ Kunjumuhammad vs S N Rock Products et al regarding balance court fee not remitted.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won