Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.07/2013

Case between Joy vs George et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Joy was involved in a case against the defendants George and Paulose. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and did not have legal representation. Consequently, the court dismissed the suit for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Joy (66 years) Thombra House, Vengola Kara, Vengola Village

Defendants

George (74 years) Thombra House, Vengola Kara, Vengola Village Paulose (78 years) Thombra House, Vengola Kara, Vengola Village

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases