Case Summary
Joy Mathew is the complainant and Saji @ Williams is the accused in this case regarding an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was absent and did not provide evidence, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused is acquitted due to the absence of the complainant and lack of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Complainant absent. No representation. Accused represented. Complainant is not ready to adduce evidence though several chances are given. Hence accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joy Mathew
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saji @ Williams
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Jolly James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Justin David
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Evidence:
Hence accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act