Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 131/2022

Case between Jose Prabhu vs Jerome Joseph et al regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-02-25
Duration
approximately-4 years 5 months
Case Closed
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jose Prabhu, filed a suit against the defendants, Jerome Joseph and Clementeena Jerome, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent illegal eviction from a leased shop. The dispute arose from the eviction threats made by the defendants despite the plaintiff's lease agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as infructuous based on the prior order of eviction by the Rent Control Court. The plaintiff did not present any contra evidence to support his case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as infructuous based on the prior order of eviction by the Rent Control Court. The plaintiff did not present any contra evidence to support his case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose Prabhu
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jerome Joseph
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Clementeena Jerome
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Order in RC (OP)16/22 dated 22/02/2024

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aramana C.K.Saiju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Meenu Das.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jasmine.M.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from illegally evicting him.
Evidence:
Hence, based on the order in RC (OP) 16/22 dated 22/02/2024 the relief sought in this suit is infructuous.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referenced this order to determine the eviction of the plaintiff from the plaint schedule building.
Reference:
RC (OP)16/22

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Jose Prabhu vs Jerome Joseph et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jose Prabhu vs Jerome Joseph et al regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 09/04/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kamalamma et al vs Sreejan et al regarding injunction and temple administration
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sulochana et al vs Rajendran regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Geetha.B. vs Madhusoodhanan regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between The Deity, Pavoor Thekkathil Sree Bhadra Devi Temple et al vs K.K.Vijayan regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sajai Kumar.A.G vs M/s.Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won