Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.392/2019

Case between Jismol Thomas vs Nishad M M regarding suit rejection.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-06-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jismol Thomas is the plaintiff and Nishad M M is the defendant. The suit was rejected as the plaintiff was absent and failed to pay the court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and the non-payment of the court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and unpaid court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jismol Thomas (44 years years) Vadakkan House, Near Government Hospital, Vattalil Flat, Peumbavoor.

Defendants

Nishad M M (40 years years) Moothedam House, Allapra P O, Kandanthara Kara, Vengola Village.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of the balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance Court Fee not paid till 3.50 PM today. Hence, suit is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases