Case Summary
Jismol Thomas is the plaintiff and Nishad M M is the defendant. The suit was rejected as the plaintiff was absent and failed to pay the court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and the non-payment of the court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and unpaid court fees.
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and unpaid court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and unpaid court fees.
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and unpaid court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and unpaid court fees.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jismol Thomas
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nishad M M
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Balance Court Fee not paid
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M A Basheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Hashim Althaf
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of the balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance Court Fee not paid till 3.50 PM today. Hence, suit is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jismol Thomas vs Nishad M M regarding suit rejection.
Case Code Year
Case between Jismol Thomas vs Nishad M M regarding suit rejection.