Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No.112 OF 2016

Case between Jimshida vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding gold business dispute

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-12-14
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Thu, 12/14/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jimshida, a pauper petitioner, filed a case against Accomplish Marketing Company seeking the return of 185.570 milligrams of gold ornaments and Rs.250 per month as interest, which the company failed to provide after financial difficulties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and granted the relief claimed by Jimshida to proceed with the case as an indigent person.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to sue as an indigent person
Case Type
Original Petition (Pauper)
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and granted the relief claimed by Jimshida to proceed with the case as an indigent person.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated the lack of means to pay the prescribed court fee, and the court found no reason to disbelieve the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner demonstrated the lack of means to pay the prescribed court fee, and the court found no reason to disbelieve the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
Nothing has brought out inorder to show that the petitioner is having sufficient means to pay court fee. Therefore, I find no reason to disbelieve the petitioner. Therefore I am satisfied that the petitioner has not possessed of sufficient means to enable him to pay the court fee prescribed by law for the plaint in the suit

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner is filed by the petitioner seeking permission to sue as a formapauries

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jimshida
Party Age
22
Relation
Daughter of Hamza
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad
Relation
Son of Parangodan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
55
Relation
Son of Sukumaran Unni
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiju
Plaintiffs Documents
Chief affidavit filed
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permission to sue as an indigent person
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Seeking permission to file suit without paying court fee
Evidence:
Petitioner has no properties except the movable properties mentioned in the petition...

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Petition (Pauper)
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jimshida vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding gold business dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Jimshida vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding gold business dispute

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 12/14/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 12/14/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 12/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sun, 12/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Parameswaran vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd., et al regarding permission to sue as indigent persons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Petition (Pauper) Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs P. Muraleedharan et al regarding transfer certificate
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Not mentioned Not available
Case between Secretary vs Kodumbil Yahu regarding debt satisfaction
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Suit - Debt Satisfaction Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Kokkoranikkal Muhammed et al regarding loan closure
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Loan Closure Unknown
Case between Uppiliyath Krishnankutty vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd regarding unpaid investments
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Original Petition (Pauper) Plaintiff Won