Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 308/2024

Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding refund of Court fee

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jigsy Joy filed a suit against Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and Akhil regarding the refund of court fees following a mediation agreement. The court found the mediation terms lawful and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff based on the terms of the mediation agreement, declaring it lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
refund of Court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff based on the terms of the mediation agreement, declaring it lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation terms were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jigsy Joy
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Akhil
Relation
Location Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P A Abhilash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jeejan T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Mediation agreement is found to be lawful and suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Mediation report received as settled. Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful. Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of Court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of Court fee as per Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding refund of Court fee
Case Code Year
Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding refund of Court fee

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won