Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 310/2024

Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding refund of Court fee

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jigsy Joy is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and Akhil. The case involves a mediation process that led to a settled agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation agreement, allowing the plaintiff to receive the refund of the court fee.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of Court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jigsy Joy (35 years years) House No. 13/923 C, Kandathiparabil, R K Pillai Road, Thoppumpady P O, Ernakulam, Pin - 682 005

Defendants

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited (Age not specified years) Opposite Hotel International, Kanaka Damodar Building, Veekshanam Road, Kacherippady, Cochin - 682 035 Akhil (Age not specified years) Opposite Hotel International, Kanaka Damodar Building, Veekshanam Road, Kacherippady, Cochin - 682 035

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases