Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 309/2024

Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding a civil suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jigsy Joy, filed a suit against Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and its Location Manager, Akhil. The court has reviewed the mediation report and found the terms of the mediation agreement to be lawful.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit has been decreed according to the lawful terms of the mediation agreement with the plaintiff entitled to a refund of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of Court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed according to the lawful terms of the mediation agreement with the plaintiff entitled to a refund of court fees.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation agreement is found to be lawful and the case was settled amicably.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jigsy Joy
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Akhil
Relation
Location Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P A Abhilash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jeejan T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding a civil suit

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won