Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.798/2024

Case between Jibin K Mathew vs V Somarajan regarding temporary injunction and leasehold rights

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-12-17
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jibin K Mathew, seeks a temporary injunction against the defendant, V Somarajan, to prevent eviction and utility disconnection from rented property. This case arose from disputes over the rental agreement and alleged harassment by the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for a temporary injunction, preventing the defendant from evicting the plaintiff or disconnecting utilities. The plaintiff is required to continue paying rent as per the agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the defendant from forcibly evicting the plaintiff and disconnecting utilities.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case established by the plaintiff regarding the risks of irreparable loss and that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the court allowed the petition and restrained the defendant from forcibly evicting the plaintiff from the plaint schedule building and from disconnecting the electric and water supply connections.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jibin K Mathew (26 years) Kunnel House, Vadserikkara, Poika P O, Pathanamthitta District, Kerala, India

Defendants

V Somarajan (58 years) #159, Second block, 3rd stage, 3F Cross Road, Judges Colony, Bangalore North, Basaveshwara Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining defendant from forcibly evicting the plaintiff and disconnecting utilities.
Evidence:
Therefore the court is satisfied that the temporary injunction has to be allowed restraining defendant from evicting the plaintiff forcefully.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of agreement made between the defendant and the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Payment Summary
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Payment summary of Rs. 16,500 paid to the defendant as rent of June 2024.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Complaint filed before the Inspector of Police, Palarivattom, by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Judgment in O S No. 543/21 of this Court.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases