Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 904/2023

Case between Jayaprakash G et al vs Jayachandran G regarding partition of property

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-2 years 13 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Jayaprakash G, Jayamol G, and Jayalakshmi G, are involved in a suit for partition against the defendant Jayachandran G regarding jointly owned property that was not divided after their father's death. The court found that the property should be divided equally among the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed for partition of the property into four equal shares, granting each plaintiff and the defendant a one-fourth share.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree of partition of the plaint schedule property into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed for partition of the property into four equal shares, granting each plaintiff and the defendant a one-fourth share.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim for partition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim for partition.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim. So, a decree can rightly be passed as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1. Plaintiff is entitled to a decree of partition of the plaint schedule property into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayaprakash G
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayamol G
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayalakshmi G
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayachandran G
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed no. 846/70 of Ernakulam SRO, Death certificate of K.K.Gangadharan issued by Mulavukad Grama Panchayath, Death Certificate of Santhamma issued by Kottayam Muncipality
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.K.Naseera
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.K.Sudheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Denny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree of partition of the plaint schedule property into 4 equal shares.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to a decree of partition of the plaint schedule property into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale deed no. 846/70 of Ernakulam SRO which established the ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of K.K.Gangadharan issued by Mulavukad Grama Panchayath, relevant for establishing the lineage and succession of property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of Santhamma issued by Kottayam Municipality, also relevant for the inheritance claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayaprakash G et al vs Jayachandran G regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Jayaprakash G et al vs Jayachandran G regarding partition of property

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 08/27/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushan O K vs Soman et al regarding injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won