Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No. 409/2019

Case between Jayakumary vs Asokan et al regarding Partition and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-12-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Jayakumary sues for partition and permanent inhibitory injunction over property previously allotted to deceased Narayanan after partition deed dispute among sons of late Kuttappan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
O.S. No. 409/2019 decreed with defendant to acknowledge payment of ₹24,120. O.S. No. 423/2019 dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to execute and register a proper receipt acknowledging discharge and payment of sum of ₹24,120.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff directed to deposit sum of ₹24,120 with court if defendant fails to execute receipt.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jayakumary (54 years years) Thodathy House, Cherukunnam Kara, Asamanoor Village, Kunnathunade Taluk

Defendants

Asokan (50 years years) Thodathi House, Cherukunnam Kara, Asamanoor Village, Kunnathunad Taluk Krishnankutty (58 years years) Thodathi House, Cherukunnam Kara, Asamanoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Rajan (55 years years) Thodathi House, Aimury Kara, Koovappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Biju (36 years years) Thodathi House, Panichiyam Kara, Asamanoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Madhavi (70 years years) Thodathi House, Panichiyam Kara, Asamanoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's claim for payment
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to execute and register a proper receipt acknowledging discharge and payment of sum of ₹24,120/-
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Defendant's claim for possession
Evidence:
O.S. No. 423 of 2019 is liable to be dismissed

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's claim of joint right, title, and interest
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's claim of threat to possession
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Judicial validation of plaintiff's claim
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Document No. 2134
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Direction to defendant for payment
Reference:
Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant's claim in partition
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission report and Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submission by Commissioner Arunima Sivan
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases