Case Summary
The case involves petitioners James K.M. and M/s. Periyar Polymers seeking the return of a fixed deposit receipt from the defendant Shaju K.P. after alleging fraud in the handling of the receipt. The petitioners claim the receipt was misappropriated by the defendant who acted as a middleman.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Return of fixed deposit receipt
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the fixed deposit receipt was not properly handled and should be returned to the petitioners.
The court found that the fixed deposit receipt was not properly handled and should be returned to the petitioners.
Judgment Evidence:
Therefore, I find that the petitioners are entitled to get the FD receipt returned by raising the lien noted.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
James K.M. (53 years)
Kallukaden House, Okkal P.O., Perumbavoor
M/s. Periyar Polymers (Age not specified years)
Okkal P.O., Okkal, Kalady, Ernakulam
Defendants
Shaju K.P (52 years)
Pothembally House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Stephen K.A. (55 years)
Kuryathu House Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to get the FD receipt returned by raising the lien noted.
Evidence:
Therefore, I find that the petitioners are entitled to get the FD receipt returned by raising the lien noted.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to allow the costs of the proceedings.