Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 236/2022

Case between James K. Dominic vs Manoj regarding withdrawal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
Case Code No.
236
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

James K. Dominic is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Manoj, the defendant. The court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit and is directed to pay the cost in favor of the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit and is directed to pay the cost in favor of the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

IA is allowed. The plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file fresh suit. Suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
James K. Dominic
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manoj
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jose Cyriac
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. Muralidhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file fresh suit.
Evidence:
IA is allowed. The plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file fresh suit.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is directed to pay the cost in favour of defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is directed to pay the cost in favour of defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Elsamma Kuriakose vs The Chief Manager (Authorised Officer) regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Johnson Joseph vs Raveendran @ Kunjumon et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Unnikrishnan K vs Mohanan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Hellen Joseph vs Joji Thomas regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sheela Raju et al vs P.K. Madhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won