Case Summary
Jamal, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Ashraf, the defendant, for money. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff's name called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jamal
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashraf
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Najmudheen.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C.P.Jamshid Rahman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vivek.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Rohith.K.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff's name called absent. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jamal vs Ashraf regarding money.
Case Code Year
Case between Jamal vs Ashraf regarding money.