Case Summary
The Iringannur Service Co Operative Bank Ltd is the petitioner in this case, while Vannatham kandiyil and Sreejith KTK are the respondents. The court has allowed the petition and restored the execution petition to file.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The court has decided to allow the petition and restore the execution petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
EA allowed. EP restored to file.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Iringannur Service Co Operative Bank Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vannatham kandiyil
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreejith KTK
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- BIJU C R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Bar Registration
- F 1753
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- VIjeesh V K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreejith KTK
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
EA allowed. EP restored to file
Evidence:
EA allowed. EP restored to file
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Iringannur Service Co Operative Bank Ltd vs Vannatham kandiyil, Sreejith KTK regarding exparte proceedings
Case Code Year
Case between Iringannur Service Co Operative Bank Ltd vs Vannatham kandiyil, Sreejith KTK regarding exparte proceedings