Case Summary
Rincy, the petitioner, has filed for enforcement of a decree against Suresh and Ajith Kumar. The case involves the arrangement of payment towards the decree debt.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The petition for enforcement is closed for the time being with an arrangement for repayment of the decree debt in installments.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner was amenable to the proposed payment plan for the decree debt.
The petitioner was amenable to the proposed payment plan for the decree debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner was amenable to the proposed payment plan for the decree debt.
The petitioner was amenable to the proposed payment plan for the decree debt.
Supporting Evidence
The proceedings indicate that the DH is amenable for the payment arrangement put forth by JD1.
Judgment Evidence:
EP is closed for the time being.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rincy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajith Kumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Prasad C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rincy et al vs Suresh et al regarding decree debt settlement.
Case Code Year
Case between Rincy et al vs Suresh et al regarding decree debt settlement.