Case Summary
Iringannur Service Co Operative Bank Ltd No filed a petition. The respondents were absent, and an ex parte order was granted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
EA allowed
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed due to the absence of the respondents.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The absence of the respondents allowed for an ex parte decision.
The absence of the respondents allowed for an ex parte decision.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The absence of the respondents allowed for an ex parte decision.
The absence of the respondents allowed for an ex parte decision.
Supporting Evidence
The absence of the respondents allowed for an ex parte decision.
Judgment Evidence:
EA allowed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Iringannur Service Co Operative Bank Ltd No
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh C K
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aneesh M P
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- BIJU C R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Bar Registration
- F 1753
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suresh C K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aneesh M P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Balan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
EA allowed
Evidence:
EA allowed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Iringannur Service Co Operative Bank Ltd No et al vs Suresh C K et al regarding ex parte order
Case Code Year
Case between Iringannur Service Co Operative Bank Ltd No et al vs Suresh C K et al regarding ex parte order