Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 351/2024

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Tony Sakaria et al regarding recovery of money

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-10-23
Duration
approximately-6 years 6 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Indian Overseas Bank filed a suit against Tony Sakaria and Ajayan G.S to recover a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the bank seeking recovery through legal means.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount. The bank is entitled to recover the amount from the defendants' assets if they fail to comply.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay ₹2,14,144.54 with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount. The bank is entitled to recover the amount from the defendants' assets if they fail to comply.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfied the court regarding the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfied the court regarding the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 2,14,144.54/- (Rupees Two lakhs Fourteen Thousand One hundred and Forty Four Rupees and Fifty four Paisa only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indian Overseas Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tony Sakaria
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajayan G.S alias Ayyappan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
A1 24.04.18 Credit sanction Advice, A2 24.04.18 Revised demand promissory note, A3 24.04.18 Letter of undertaking repayment in Installment, A4 24.04.18 Letter of Guarantee, A5 19.04.21 Revised letter, A6 30.01.24 Copy of the legal notice, A7 Postal receipts with acknowledgment cards and returned covers, A8 24.04.18 - Account statement issued by Indian Overseas Bank, Ernakulam – Kadavanthra along with certificate under the Bankers Book Evidence Act.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jaykar K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Remya Jaykar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Srikala P.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff seeks to recover the outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 2,14,144.54/- (Rupees Two lakhs Fourteen Thousand One hundred and Forty Four Rupees and Fifty four Paisa only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Credit Sanction Advice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document establishes the initial loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Revised Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document outlines terms of repayment for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking repayment in Installment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It signifies the borrower’s commitment to repay the loan in installments.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides assurance for the loan repayment by the guarantor.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Revised letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document updates any previous communications related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of the legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice demands repayment from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipts with acknowledgment cards and returned covers
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents serve as proof of communication regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Account statement issued by Indian Overseas Bank, Ernakulam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The account statement details the loan account activity and outstanding balance.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Tony Sakaria et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Tony Sakaria et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 04/24/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won