Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 400/2023

Case between IDBI Bank Limtied vs Rejinathan P M et al regarding suit withdrawal

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

IDBI Bank Limtied filed a suit against Rejinathan P M and P T Mani. The matter was settled between the parties, and the plaintiff sought permission to withdraw the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff sought to withdraw the suit due to a settlement between the parties. The suit was dismissed as withdrawn, and all interim orders were vacated.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff sought to withdraw the suit due to a settlement between the parties. The suit was dismissed as withdrawn, and all interim orders were vacated.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff voluntarily chose to withdraw the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff voluntarily chose to withdraw the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff filed a withdrawal memo seeking permission to withdraw the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence satisfied that the plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit further. Hence suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
IDBI Bank Limtied
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manoj Kumar K
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o Nanu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rejinathan P M
Relation
S/o Mani P T
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P T Mani
Relation
S/o Thankappan Krishna Panicker
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K P Sujeshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Keerthi K Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswin B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S Abhilash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ahsana
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought permission to withdraw the suit.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed withdrawal memo seeking permission to withdraw the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Limtied vs Rejinathan P M et al regarding suit withdrawal
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Limtied vs Rejinathan P M et al regarding suit withdrawal

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won