Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 35 /2024

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Division et al regarding Court Fee Payment

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-09-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves IDBI Bank Limited as the plaintiff against Kudumbasree Division and several defendants regarding the payment of court fees. The plaintiff was absent and not represented during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaintiff's case due to the absence of representation and lack of paid court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's case due to the absence of representation and lack of paid court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not represented and failed to pay the necessary court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not represented and failed to pay the necessary court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of The Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
IDBI Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kudumbasree Division
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahmath Adul Shaheer
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o Adul Shaheer A
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rejeena P P
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o Pareed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeja Yasir
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o Yasir
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usaiba
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o Yusuf
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paulochan Antony P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Girish R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent Not Represented. No Balance Court Fee seen paid. Plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of The Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Division et al regarding Court Fee Payment
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Division et al regarding Court Fee Payment

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won