Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1245/2023

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 12 NHG 8 et al regarding balance court fee not remitted

Court
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

IDBI Bank Limited filed a suit against Kudumbasree Div 12 NHG 8 and several individuals for recovery of dues. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the balance court fee, resulting in dismissal of the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the balance court fee, resulting in dismissal of the case.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to comply with court fee requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to comply with court fee requirements.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff represented. Balance Court fee not remitted. Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff represented. Balance Court fee not remitted. Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
IDBI Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kudumbasree Div 12 NHG 8
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tency P F
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o A D Jackson
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyji Benny
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o Benny
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Uma Manoj
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o Manoj
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Agnus(Sinija)
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o Cleetus K A
Plaintiffs Documents
N/A
Defendants Documents
N/A

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pauloachan Antony P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Girish R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure
Evidence:
Balance Court fee not remitted. Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 12 NHG 8 et al regarding balance court fee not remitted
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 12 NHG 8 et al regarding balance court fee not remitted

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won