Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 22/2024

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbashree DIV 8 NHG 48 LUCKYSTAR et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves IDBI Bank Limited as the plaintiff against Kudumbashree DIV 8 NHG 48 LUCKYSTAR and other defendants. The matter was settled between the parties and the court dismissed the suit as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff submitted that the matter was settled between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff submitted that the matter was settled between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled between parties and the plaintiff chose not to proceed with the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled between parties and the plaintiff chose not to proceed with the case.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for plaintiff submits matter settled between parties and not proceeding with this case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
IDBI Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kudumbashree DIV 8 NHG 48 LUCKYSTAR
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kudumbashree DIV 8 NHG 48 LUCKYSTAR
Relation
represented by its Secretary Sanooja M.G.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kampivelikkakath Shamsudheen Shamru
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanooja M.G.
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Susmitha
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jaykar K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramya Jaykar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Padmapriya P.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed due to settlement between parties.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbashree DIV 8 NHG 48 LUCKYSTAR et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbashree DIV 8 NHG 48 LUCKYSTAR et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won