Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 66/2024

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbashree Div 5 Nhg 93 Angel et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-12
Duration
approximately-3 months
Case Closed
Tue, 03/12/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

IDBI Bank Limited filed a suit against Kudumbashree Div 5 Nhg 93 Angel and other members for recovery of a loan amount due. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed, ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs.3,57,776/- with interest. The defendants failed to appear in court despite being summoned.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.3,57,776/- with 8% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed, ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs.3,57,776/- with interest. The defendants failed to appear in court despite being summoned.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and proved the claim satisfactorily.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and proved the claim satisfactorily.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.3,57,776/- with 8% interest per annum from the date of suit (ie, from 19.01.2024) till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
IDBI Bank Limited
Relation
represented by its Assistant General Manager and Branch Head as Authorised Officer, Preeth Krishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kudumbashree Div 5 Nhg 93 Angel
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kudumbashree Div 5 Nhg 93 Angel
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseera
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o U Hussain
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mamalamparambil Mohammed Sunitha
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o Thyparambil Mohammed Noushad
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
NaseemaHaneefa
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o Haneefa Ershan
Plaintiffs Documents
Original letter of Intent, Original inter-se Agreement, Original of the articles of loan agreement for Financing Self Help group, Original demand promissory note, Lawyer notice, Printout of Statement of account maintained by the plaintiff Bank.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayakar K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju Jayakar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Padmapriya P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested to recover the amount due from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.3,57,776/-.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original letter of Intent
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to prove the loan agreement and its terms.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Inter-Se agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the agreement among the members of the self-help group.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original of the articles of loan agreement for Financing Self Help group
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the terms of the loan extended to the self-help group.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a guarantee for the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to demonstrate that the plaintiff informed the defendants about the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Printout of Statement of account maintained by the plaintiff Bank
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the financial details regarding the loan owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbashree Div 5 Nhg 93 Angel et al regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbashree Div 5 Nhg 93 Angel et al regarding recovery of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/19/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 03/12/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won