Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No . 143/2021

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs ASHRAYAM JLG UNIT NO A 56 PRADEEKSHA et al regarding suit rejection

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, IDBI Bank Limited, was represented by its Assistant General Manager. The defendants included multiple individuals and a charitable society.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and there was no representation. The suit was rejected due to unpaid court fees despite several opportunities.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and no representation for Plaintiff. Suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

IDBI Bank Limited (Age not specified years) IDBI Tower, WTC, Complex, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400005

Defendants

ASHRAYAM JLG UNIT NO A 56 PRADEEKSHA (Age not specified years) C/o ASHRAYA KERALA Charitable Society, CC XX/2018, Kacheripady Palluruthy, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 006 Sabitha K B (31 years years) Konneriyil, Vaikkom P.O, Kottayam – 686 141 Uma Devi M (43 years years) Karippuram, Chalapparambu, Vaikkom P.O, Kottayam – 686 141 Usha (44 years years) AnooshBhavan, Vadayar, Kottayam – 686 605 Seena Anilkumar (43 years years) Koyikkal Puthan Veed, Vaikkom P.O, Kottayam- 686 141

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and no representation for Plaintiff. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases