O.S No . 143/2021

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs ASHRAYAM JLG UNIT NO A 56 PRADEEKSHA et al regarding suit rejection

Court

THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2025-03-20

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, IDBI Bank Limited, was represented by its Assistant General Manager. The defendants included multiple individuals and a charitable society.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The plaintiff was absent and there was no representation. The suit was rejected due to unpaid court fees despite several opportunities.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The plaintiff was absent and there was no representation. The suit was rejected due to unpaid court fees despite several opportunities.

Key Reasoning:

Why Defendant Won:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and no representation for Plaintiff. Suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: IDBI Bank Limited
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: ASHRAYAM JLG UNIT NO A 56 PRADEEKSHA

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sabitha K B
Party Age: 31
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Uma Devi M
Party Age: 43
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Usha
Party Age: 44
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Seena Anilkumar
Party Age: 43
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Paulochan Antony P
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Padmapriya P
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Suit rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of balance court fee.

Evidence: