Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.905/2022

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit No 25 Anugraha et al regarding rejection of plaint

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-27
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 01/27/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

IDBI Bank Limited has filed a suit against Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit No 25 Anugraha and several other defendants. The court found that the plaintiff did not pay the required court fees, resulting in the rejection of the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to pay the required court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to pay the required court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff is represented. No balance court fees paid despite giving sufficient time and direction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
IDBI Bank Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit No 25 Anugraha
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashvathi
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sini Mathai
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alice
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepa Sathesh
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Paulochan Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Padmapriya. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fees.
Evidence:
No balance court fees paid despite giving sufficient time and direction. Hence, plaint is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit No 25 Anugraha et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit No 25 Anugraha et al regarding rejection of plaint

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 01/27/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won