Case Summary
The plaintiffs, represented by their advocates, are Hydros Koya Thangal and Noorul Huda. The case concerns a suit for declaration and injunction, which was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent and not represented in court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hydros Koya Thangal @ Sayyid Hydros Jifri Thangal
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Noorul Huda
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rukhiya
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Basheer @ Babu
- Party Age
- 30
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aboobacker @ Unni
- Party Age
- 20
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.A.Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Mohammed Basil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.K. Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for declaration and injunction.
Evidence:
Plaintiff's counsel reported no instruction. Plaintiff called absent, not represented.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hydros Koya Thangal @ Sayyid Hydros Jifri Thangal vs Rukhiya et al regarding declaration and injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Hydros Koya Thangal @ Sayyid Hydros Jifri Thangal vs Rukhiya et al regarding declaration and injunction.