Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 120 OF 2017

Case between Hydros Koya Thangal @ Sayyid Hydros Jifri Thangal vs Rukhiya et al regarding declaration and injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-02-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by their advocates, are Hydros Koya Thangal and Noorul Huda. The case concerns a suit for declaration and injunction, which was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent and not represented in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Hydros Koya Thangal @ Sayyid Hydros Jifri Thangal (38 years) Puthiya Maliyekkal House, Vettompallipram amsom desom, Perinthallur, Tirur Taluk, P.O. Vettompallipram Noorul Huda (28 years) Puthiya Maliyekkal House, Vettompallipram amsom desom, Perinthallur, Tirur Taluk, P.O. Vettompallipram

Defendants

Rukhiya (53 years) Kiliyam Parambil House Basheer @ Babu (30 years) Vettompallipram amsom desom, Perinthallur, Tirur Taluk, P.O. Vettompallipram Aboobacker @ Unni (20 years) Vettompallipram amsom desom, Perinthallur, Tirur Taluk, P.O. Vettompallipram

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit for declaration and injunction.
Evidence:
Plaintiff's counsel reported no instruction. Plaintiff called absent, not represented.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases