Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.Ptn 173/2018

Case between Holakkapulikkaparmbil Pokke vs Cholakkapulikka Parambil Pokker @ Kunhimon regarding restoration petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2018-05-24
Duration
0 years, 4 months, 8 days
Case Code No.
173
Case Closed
Thu, 05/24/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Restoration petition filed by Holakkapulikkaparmbil Pokke was allowed by the court on condition of payment of cost of Rs.6000.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by the petitioner on the condition of payment of cost of Rs.6000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by the petitioner on the condition of payment of cost of Rs.6000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Allowed. Vide separate order on condition to payment of cost of Rs.6000/-. For payment. Cost paid. IA allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Holakkapulikkaparmbil Pokke
Party Age
1
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cholakkapulikka Parambil Pokker @ Kunhimon
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Chandrashekaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Cholakkapulikka Parambil Pokker @ Kunhimon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of petition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration petition allowed by court on condition of payment of cost of Rs.6000.
Evidence:
Allowed. Vide separate order on condition to payment of cost of Rs.6000/-. For payment. Cost paid. IA allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 01/17/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 05/24/2018 - 12:00
From
Tue, 05/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Thu, 05/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Kuvvaparambath Bhaskaran regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Poppat Prakash Lakshman Jadav vs Suchetha regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won