Case Summary
HDFC Bank Ltd filed a suit against Smt. Jeena Tito. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HDFC Bank Ltd
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smt. Jeena Tito
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T. Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.V. Haridasan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B. Deepak
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Karthik Bhavadasan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between HDFC Bank Ltd vs Smt. Jeena Tito regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between HDFC Bank Ltd vs Smt. Jeena Tito regarding suit dismissal for default