Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 513/2018

Case between HDFC Bank Ltd vs Smt. Jeena Tito regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-03-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

HDFC Bank Ltd filed a suit against Smt. Jeena Tito. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

HDFC Bank Ltd (Age not specified years) Choice Tower, Manorama Junction, Ernakuam

Defendants

Smt. Jeena Tito (Age not specified years) 301-6/335, Pavarattikkaran, 6-Manakkody, Arimbur, Thrissur-680 012

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases