Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No.1164/2024

Case between HDFC Bank Ltd. vs Mr. Wiliam Baretto et al regarding absence in court proceedings

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-02-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

HDFC Bank Ltd. is the plaintiff in this case against Mr. Wiliam Baretto and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence without representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found the plaintiff absent without representation and dismissed the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff no representation. Plaintiff is continuously absent without representation and no steps is taken as ordered. Plaintiff is absent despite specific direction to appear. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

HDFC Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) M.G Road, Ravipuram, M.G Road, Kochi – 682 016

Defendants

Mr. Wiliam Baretto (58 years) Amtady House, Modankap P.O, Bantwal District, Manglore, Karnataka, PIN – 574 219 M/s. Motif Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) Door No.XI/237, A29, 4th Floor, Hayath Tower, Juma Masjid, Padamugal, Kakkanad, Kochi – 682 021 Altaf M.I (45 years) Alfa Mansion, 10/144 9 A, K.B Jacob Road, Kochi – 682 001

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases