Case Summary
The complainant, HDFC Bank Ltd, represented by their Legal Manager, brought a case against Jobin Joyce for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court dismissed the complaint due to the repeated absence of the complainant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused due to the complainant's absence and dismissed the complaint under section 256 Cr.PC.
Key Reasoning:
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absence.
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absence.
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absence.
Supporting Evidence
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HDFC Bank Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jobin Joyce
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- T R Sathyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Evidence:
Hence complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2020
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act