Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.394/2017

Case between Havvabi et al vs Moidu Khan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves plaintiffs Havvabi et al, siblings, and defendant Moidu Khan in a dispute over family properties and interference. Plaintiffs seek permanent prohibitory injunction against defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs granted permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prohibit trespassing, interference with property, and damaging actions.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

null

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Havvabi (57 years) Thondikuzha Kara, Karikkodu Village, Thodupuzha Taluk Khadheejabi (54 years) Ullali Mundeth House, South Ezhipram Kara, Vazhakulam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Shajitha (47 years) Ullali Naduparambil House, Thottakkattu Kara, Aluva West Village, Aluva Taluk Shafitha (37 years) Chemmalakudy House, Chelakkara Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Sara Umma (78 years) Thenoor House, Ellath myalil, Cheruvelikunnu Bhagam, Pallipram Kara, Marambilly Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Moidu Khan (53 years) Thenoor House, Ellath myalil, Cheruvelikunnu Bhagam, Pallipram Kara, Marambilly Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
From the unrebutted evidence adduced by the plaintiff, I hold that plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of settelment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to prove the case of the plaintiff that the defendants are liable to pay the amount due
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used as evidence
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documented evidence adduced by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documented evidence adduced by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documented evidence adduced by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documented evidence adduced by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases