Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.394/2017

Case between Havvabi et al vs Moidu Khan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration
Case Code No.
394
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves plaintiffs Havvabi et al, siblings, and defendant Moidu Khan in a dispute over family properties and interference. Plaintiffs seek permanent prohibitory injunction against defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs granted permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prohibit trespassing, interference with property, and damaging actions.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiffs granted permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prohibit trespassing, interference with property, and damaging actions.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
null

Judgment Evidence:

null

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Havvabi
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Khadheejabi
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shajitha
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shafitha
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sara Umma
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moidu Khan
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of settelment deed No. 4836/2006, Land tax receipt from Marambilly Village
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
From the unrebutted evidence adduced by the plaintiff, I hold that plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of settelment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to prove the case of the plaintiff that the defendants are liable to pay the amount due
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used as evidence
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documented evidence adduced by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documented evidence adduced by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documented evidence adduced by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documented evidence adduced by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won