Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No.391/2019

Case between Haridas vs Sumathi et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The suit is for partition of a property among siblings. The plaintiff seeks declaration of his possession and title over one-half share.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff is entitled to one-half share, the remaining half vests jointly with the defendants. The court decreed partition by metes and bounds.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff is entitled to one-half share, the remaining half vests jointly with the defendants. The court decreed partition by metes and bounds.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Haridas
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumathi
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raji
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Partition Deed No. 1670/1995 of SRO, Perumbavoor. Partition, Certified copy of Settlement Deed No. 3094/1996 of SRO, Perumbavoor, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 8756/07 of SRO, Perumbavoor
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G Govindan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K O Santhosh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V G Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P R Sreedevi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to one-half share of property
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to one-half (½) share, and the defendants jointly to the remaining one-half (½) share in the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of partition
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of settlement
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of sale
Reference:
A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haridas vs Sumathi et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Haridas vs Sumathi et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Dipin R vs Deepthy R regarding partition and consequential reliefs.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Baby Chandran vs M K Manoharan et al regarding partitioning of property
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Partition Suit Unknown
Case between Enid D'cruz et al vs Green Joseph Fernandez regarding Partition
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kannaki Viswanath vs Arun Viswanathan regarding Partition
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Partition Suit Unknown
Case between Saji Joseph vs Elsy regarding Partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won