Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
FDA.No. 5/2024 in O.S No. 5/2021

Case between Baby Chandran vs M K Manoharan et al regarding partitioning of property

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-02-11
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Baby Chandran, plaintiff, filed suit for partitioning the property and obtaining their share as per the preliminary decree. Defendants appeared through their counsels, no counter filed, advocate commissioner appointed for property division.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
Final decree passed for partition with division of property into 3 equal shares, allotting specific plots to each party.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Partition of property with allotment of specific plots to each party.
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
Final decree passed for partition with division of property into 3 equal shares, allotting specific plots to each party.
Key Reasoning:
The advocate commissioner's property division was found equitable as per the preliminary decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The advocate commissioner's property division was found equitable as per the preliminary decree.
Supporting Evidence
On going through the commissioner's report and hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents this court is of the view...

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed and the final decree is passed as follows: Plot C in Ext.C1(a) having an extent of 1.400 cents in Sy No. 1038...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baby Chandran
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M K Manoharan
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohini Mohanan
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jayaraj K K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Final decree passed for partitioning the property as per preliminary decree
Evidence:
The commissioner's report and plan were accepted by the court

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Contains details of the division of the decree schedule property
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Shows the layout of the decree schedule property
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Baby Chandran vs M K Manoharan et al regarding partitioning of property
Case Code Year
Case between Baby Chandran vs M K Manoharan et al regarding partitioning of property

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/29/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Dipin R vs Deepthy R regarding partition and consequential reliefs.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Enid D'cruz et al vs Green Joseph Fernandez regarding Partition
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Haridas vs Sumathi et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kannaki Viswanath vs Arun Viswanathan regarding Partition
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Partition Suit Unknown
Case between Saji Joseph vs Elsy regarding Partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won