Case Summary
Hafsath filed a restoration petition against Abdullakutty seeking restoration of a previous order.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of previous order
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid. Petition stands allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hafsath
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdullakutty C.K.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaharban
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Majeed Kalappattil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.P.Khaleel Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of previous order
Evidence:
Cost paid. Petition stands allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2015