Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
FDA No.22/2023

Case between Gracy et al vs Joseph et al regarding FDA

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Gracy and additional plaintiffs are in a case against Joseph and additional defendants regarding FDA matters. The plaintiffs stated that they are not pressing the FDA.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the FDA as not pressed by the plaintiff. The matter was concluded in a single hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
FDA
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the FDA as not pressed by the plaintiff. The matter was concluded in a single hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

FDA dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gracy
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabu
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saly Biju
Party Age
44
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sophy Sixon
Party Age
40
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.V. Joseph
Party Age
71
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Johny
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Wilson
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiny Thomas
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.R. Ramanadhan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lakshmi Ramanath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.T. Geevarghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.A.Shemeer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.K.Salimkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Devassykutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
FDA not pressed
Evidence:
FDA dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
FDA
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gracy et al vs Joseph et al regarding FDA
Case Code Year
Case between Gracy et al vs Joseph et al regarding FDA

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between C P Joseph et al vs C P Francis et al regarding final decree application.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
FDA Defendant Won
Case between Pathrose vs Baby regarding review of order
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between M/s Arrikar Foods Pvt. Ltd., et al vs M/s Swapna Traders, regarding recovery of dues for purchase of rice products
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Civil Plaintiff Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Malathi Kunjamma et al vs Lalitha et al regarding Amendment of Plaint Schedule Property
Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Civil Case Defendant Won